Russell's Ramblings

Sunday, December 31, 2006

Phyllis Bennis on Hussein's execution

Talking Points on the Execution of Saddam Hussein

Good, as usual. She's a fellow at IPS. Here first point, about how different this is from Nuremberg is very good, as is this one:
Some ask "if the trial had been fair, would the results have been different?" The conviction of Saddam Hussein for huge crimes against the Iraqi people would almost certainly be the same. The key difference would have been that a fair trial would have allowed -- insisted on -- including evidence implicating those who enabled those crimes: the U.S. for providing military, financial and diplomatic support for the regime, as well as providing the seed stock for biological weapons; the Brits for providing growth medium for biological weapons; the Germans for providing chemical weapons; the French for providing missile technology... etc.... Also, in a "new Iraq" the convictions after a fair trial would have led to life imprisonment -- not the death penalty.

Labels: ,